Evaluation Procedures and Required Level of Achievement

The following programs receive Satisfactory Progress Evaluations in both attendance and academics.

Cosmetology 1000 clock hours 

Barbering 1000 clock hours 

Esthetics 600 clock hours 

The Satisfactory Progress Evaluation will occur when students reach the following actual hours and academic weeks: 

Program Name 

1st SAP Evaluation Period Ends 

2nd SAP Evaluation Period Ends 

3rd SAP Evaluation Period Ends 

Cosmetology (20 hour schedule) 

450 actual hours and 23 weeks 

900 actual hours and 45 weeks 

N/A 

Cosmetology (35 hour schedule) 

450 actual hours and 13 weeks 

900 actual hours and 26 weeks 

N/A 

Barbering (20 hour schedule) 

450 actual hours and 23 weeks 

900 actual hours and 45 weeks 

N/A 

Barbering (35 hour schedule) 

450 actual hours and 13 weeks 

900 actual hours and 26 weeks 

N/A 

Esthetics (20 hour schedule) 

300 actual hours and 15 weeks 

N/A 

N/A 

Esthetics (35 hour schedule) 

300 actual hours and 9 weeks 

N/A 

N/A 

The first evaluation will occur no later than the midpoint of the academic year. The SAP evaluations are completed within seven (7) school business days of the student reaching the evaluation points.

At the end of each evaluation period, the school will determine if the student has maintained at least 80% cumulative attendance since the beginning of the course which indicates that, given the same attendance rate, the student will graduate within the maximum 125% time frame allowed.

The student’s attendance will be evaluated at Institutional Attendance checkpoints at the completion of each calendar month.  A student who is not maintaining at least a cumulative of 80% attendance will be placed on Institutional Attendance Warning status until the next Institutional Attendance checkpoint.  

The student will be advised in writing on the actions required to attain Institutional Attendance by the next evaluation. Students are allowed to make up hours to meet attendance.  Refer to the Make Up Hour Policy.  If at the end of the Institutional Attendance warning period, the student has still not met attendance requirements, he/she may be dropped from the program with the right to appeal.

The following grading system is used to evaluate a student’s academic ability: 

  1. Examinations are given in all subjects.
  2. If a student receives an UnSatisfactory Academic Progress Evaluation, the Future Professional Advisor will meet in person with the student, the evaluation will be reviewed and signed by the student acknowledging their unsatisfactory status. The evaluation is maintained in the student’s financial file. The Satisfactory Academic Progress Evaluation will reflect if the student’s evaluation will impact the students eligibility for Financial Aid. The student may request to review their Satisfactory Academic Progress Evaluation from the Financial Services Leader or Future Professional Advisor. 

The following grading scale is used for theory progress: 

A = 90 – 100% B = 80 – 89% C = 70 – 79% Failing = Below 70% 

Practical skills are graded by instructor approval in CourseKey Skills Tracker or guest ticket. A signature from an instructor represents a passing grade, which means all elements of the practical grading criteria were met. No signature indicates a failing score, which means one or more of the practical grading criteria elements were not met and the student has not met minimum satisfactory standards on the practical application. Students are required to continue and/or repeat the practical application until they receive a signature from an instructor.

*The school uses a 900-hour academic year/ 26 academic weeks for Title IV purposes.